Bridge IP Law Commentary »

[...] (By Luo Yanjie) Abstract: The new Trademark Law stipulates that only the interested party may file an opposition to a trademark application [...]

[...] (in China, identical marks can be registered under different classifications pursuant to the trademark law), and applied with China’s National Copyright Administration to register its works & [...]

[...] (By Luo Yanjie) Abstract: China’s new Trademark Law still enforces the principle of “first to file,” but at the same time a prior user [...]

[...] action constitutes an act of manufacturing rather than a use of a trademark pursuant to the Trademark Law. Ruitian Clothing received a commission from an overseas company to manufacture goods, and [...]

[...] Generally, before registration, an enterprise never receives corresponding protection for its enterprise name. However, in relation to its pre-approved enterprise name before registration, the pre- [...]

[...] right all over the China and shall be under equal protection. In practice, for an act of an enterprise name infringing a registered trademark, the court may make a comprehensive judgment of different [...]

[...] (By Luo Yanjie ) Abstract: Generally, trademark right and the right of enterprise name are independent of each other. But these rights, who also acted as enterprise business mark [...]

[...] had already been introduced as a successful case study in a relevant field. Considering the enterprise name had already achieved high popularity and brand awareness, the protection to the enterprise [...]

[...] as their enterprise name to confuse consumers. As such, these conducts still constitute trademark infringement. In today’s post, we will introduce a typical case concerning that using another& [...]

[...] pens and impose a fine of RMB 46,000, on the grounds that these pens constituted trademark infringement against the exclusive right holder, Shanghai Hero Pen Co., Ltd of the “Hero” [...]

[...] Abstract: Market managers shall fulfill its duty to exercise reasonable case to stop from trademark infringement. “Intentionally facilitating an infringement by another person or party of an [...]

[...] beer bottle was recycled from the market, such reason cannot be a defense against trademark infringement from the appellant. Under the fact that bottle recycling is in compliance with [...]

[...] (By Luo Yanjie) Abstract: The Implementing Regulations of the Copyright law stipulates “works” under the protection of the Copyright Law shall be under [...]

[...] (By Luo Yanjie) Abstract:  The Copyright Law protects “expression” rather than “thinking”. For the purposes of the [...]

[...] to find non-infringement seems correct. However, in regard to the question whether the copyright law should protect medical product instructions, we find ourselves in a rather difficult position; [...]

[...] below regarding what the difficulties are in the online copyright enforcement in China. The Copyright Law aims to protect many types of works, including cinematographic works, television, written [...]

[...] existed in the market and shall not be considered as specific ones. In the preceding of second instance, the Harbin Brewery also provided some decisions of punishment, detailed lists and the photos [...]

[...] with the ruling of first instance, both Huawei and InterDigital appealed. The court of second instance found that the major focuses in this case are following: first, whether the legal proceeding [...]

[...] the decision, SAMSUNG brought the case to courts and finally got support from the court of second instance, thus now likely being able to register its Chinese-transliterated trademark for cameras. In [...]

[...] into false thinking that they are associated with each other and cause confusion. The second instance decided that the two focuses of this case are as follows: the first is whether the disputed [...]

[...] , so as to avoid terminating a labor contract with legal rotation procedure.   Lawyer Contacts You Yunting：86-21-52134918 youyunting@debund.com/yytbest@gmail.com Disclaimer of Bridge IP Law [...]

[...] confusion. As such, the disputed trademark must be approved to be registered.  Lawyer Contacts You Yunting：86-21-52134918  youyunting@debund.com/yytbest@gmail.com Disclaimer of Bridge IP [...]

[...] applied for preservation and take measures of seizing and sealing up prudently.  Lawyer Contacts You Yunting：86-21-52134918  youyunting@debund.com/yytbest@gmail.com Disclaimer of Bridge IP [...]

[...] is made for any losses incurred as a result of the preservation.  Lawyer Contacts You Yunting：86-21-52134918  youyunting@debund.com/yytbest@gmail.com Disclaimer of Bridge [...]

[...] You Yunting：86-21-52134918  youyunting@debund.com/yytbest@gmail.com Disclaimer of Bridge IP Law Commentary [...]

[...] You Yunting：86-21-52134918  youyunting@debund.com/yytbest@gmail.com Disclaimer of Bridge IP Law Commentary Related Posts Could NetDragon’s Providing Plants vs Zombies 2 Be Protected under [...]

[...] You Yunting：86-21-52134918  youyunting@debund.com/yytbest@gmail.com Disclaimer of Bridge IP Law Commentary Related Posts What is Protecable under China’s Anti Unfair Competition Law? Has [...]

[...] You Yunting：86-21-52134918  youyunting@debund.com/yytbest@gmail.com Disclaimer of Bridge IP Law Commentary Related Posts China Revised Its Law on Jurisdiction of Internet Infringement Involving [...]

[...] may use Article 41 of the Trademark Law to revoke rush-registered trademarks with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board. The Trademark Law stipulates that the owner of a trademark or any [...]

[...] may use Article 41 of the Trademark Law to revoke rush-registered trademarks with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board. The Trademark Law stipulates that the owner of a trademark or any [...]

[...] evidence from Burberry after consideration, but Burberry applied for review with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, triggering heated debates in China. Lawyers’ Comments: [...]

[...] game operator rush-registered a trademark. In this case that trademark was canceled by Trademark Review and Adjudication Board. Introduction to the Case: Applicant: EST Software Corporation (the & [...]

[...] by others before the registrant’s application, the exclusive right holder of said registered trademark shall have no right to prohibit other people from using the aforesaid trademark from [...]

[...] approaches to acquire the trademark will be taken. For example, purchase the previous registered trademark. Pay attention to whether previous applications or registrations contain all sub-classes, [...]

[...] Chinese Courts Reject Perfetti’s Counterclaim for Unfair Competition? Fair Use of a Registered Trademark does not Constitute Infringement “Passive use” is not equivalent to “ [...]

[...] trademark under various classes. However, the provision stipulating the cancellation of a registered trademark based on the cessation of use for three consecutive years did not provide well-known [...]

[...] Websites Kinda Fair Use in the Copyright Law? Would Those First Users Involved in OEM Constitute Trademark Infringement? Will Magic be Protected as A Work under China’s Copyright Law? Whether [...]

[...] Inner Approval of the Company in China Would Those First Users Involved in OEM Constitute Trademark Infringement? Will an “A+B” Combined Trademark be Considered Substantially [...]

[...] Dispute Caused by Recycled Budweiser Bottles Would Those First Users Involved in OEM Constitute Trademark Infringement? Will an “A+B” Combined Trademark be Considered Substantially Similar [...]

[...] Kinda Fair Use in the Copyright Law? Would Those First Users Involved in OEM Constitute Trademark Infringement? Whether using the Name of Another’s Work Constitutes Copyright [...]