Comments on:

Medium-length materials prevail on 'Comments on:' that may be an effective tactic to grip their readers’ attention with a wider range of helpful content. There are also a few longer items, which can provide a deeper insight into their subjects. Moreover, there are a few short articles.

'Comments on:' mostly contains texts of a basic readability level which may show their aim to reach a wider audience. Besides, there are a smaller number of articles of intermediate readability.

Negative aspect tends to prevail throughout the texts on the channel: that usually indicates a big amount of critical judgments and negatively biased opinion expressions (e.g. there may be some foul language or curse words contributing into a negative score).However, there are also some articles with a comparably favourable attitude and they make up more than a quarter of all the channel’s content.