Comments on:

Short articles, prevailing on the channel, can be a good choice for 'Comments on:' if they’re going to gain their audience’s sympathy with brevity. Also, there are medium-length pieces making up more than one third of all articles.

'Comments on:' mostly contains texts of a basic readability level which may show their aim to reach a wider audience. Besides, there are a smaller number of articles of intermediate readability.

Negative aspect tends to prevail throughout the texts on the channel: that usually indicates a big amount of critical judgments and negatively biased opinion expressions (e.g. there may be some foul language or curse words contributing into a negative score).However, there are also some articles with a comparably favourable attitude and they make up more than a quarter of all the channel’s content.