New Jersey Criminal Civil Lawyer

[...] , or operates a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or more by weight of alcohol in the defendant’s [...]

[...] ’s license, or alternatively, mandating the offender’s forfeiture of the right to operate a motor vehicle if the offender instead does not own or lease a motor vehicle and there is no vehicle the [...]

[...] to the commission requiring the commission to refuse to issue a license to operate a motor vehicle to the person for a period of not less than 180 days.” The ambiguity first is focused on [...]

[...] rehabilitation program. The sentence is imposed for the fourth degree crime of operating a motor vehicle during a period of license suspension with multiple DWI convictions. This may seem odd to some [...]

[...] passed legislation on Thursday (S-2427) that would require drunk drivers to install an ignition interlock device into their vehicle. The bill passed the Senate with a vote of 34 to 2, and is now sent [...]

[...] penalties for certain drunk driving offenses, including mandating installation of ignition interlock device, and creates restricted use driver’s  license. CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT As introduced. An [...]

[...] drunk driving offenses.  These revisions include mandating the installation of an ignition interlock device in the motor vehicle owned, leased, or principally operated by the offender and the [...]

[...] , Jeffrey Hark This blog discusses Aiges v. Fuccillo decided October 14, 2014 by the Appellate Division. Thisis a case that concerns admissibility of lay person statements. The plaintiff was dog- [...]

[...] its decision to which the appellate division gave great deference.  The appellate division also reviewed the testimony of the treating doctor and accepted the trial court’s well [...]

[...] today is State v. Bridges, decided July 2, 2014 in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. The basic facts of the case are that Newark police encountered two vehicles involved in a [...]

[...] to suppress evidence in State v. Hamb, decided July 25, 2014 by the Superior Court of NJ, Appellate Division. The basic facts of the case are that a detective was inside a Wawa store when he noticed a [...]

[...] by New Jersey Sex Crime Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. In this case, the Court reviews whether the trial court misapplied the sentencing principles of the Code of Criminal Justice in imposing a sentence [...]

[...] Hark STATE VS. JUSTIN LEE  (APP. DIV 2014) This case addresses the standard of review for a trial court when reviewing a prosecutor’s denial of PTI (Pretrial Intervention).  The issue in this case [...]

[...] by the motion judge, are analytically indistinguishable from the salient facts in Smith. The trial court’s decision to suppress the crack cocaine defendant turned over to a police officer must be [...]

[...] -on car accident between a plaintiff and defendant. On appeal the plaintiff claimed that the trial court erred in declining to consider an expert report from her doctor because it was submitted after [...]

[...] Submitted by New Jersey DWI Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark Our court has outlined exigency in See State v. Eckel, 185 N.J. 523. [...]

[...] to meet any of these basic standards of care and the safe protocol that is used throughout New Jersey and the United States. …. The defendants were aware that the failure to install adequate [...]

[...] Submitted by New Jersey DWI Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark Contrary to popular belief in order to prove intoxication for a DWI [...]

[...] What constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel? Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark This blog considers State v. Palacios, decided July 3, 2014 by [...]

[...] Submitted by Jeffrey Hark, attorney representing Timothy Seidel BRIDGETON – The mother of a Millville police officer [...]

[...] Submitted by Jeffrey Hark, New Jersey Criminal Attorney representing Timothy Seidel Originally published here by Press [...]

[...] Submitted by Jeffrey Hark, attorney representing Timothy Seidel Timothy Seidel, of Commercial Township, appears in [...]

[...] Submitted by New Jersey Sex Crime Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. The tender-years exception to the hearsay rule which states: [A] statement made by a child [...]

[...] In three cases the NJ Supreme Court has allowed the state to call a witness who ‘reviewed’ lab results and prepared reports in [...]

[...] that the defendant had a bomb was unreasonable in the totality of the circumstances. The N.J. Supreme Court granted certification and in turn found the defendant guilty of first-degree murder. This is [...]

[...] Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark State v. Bruno Gibson, decided September 16, 2014 by the Supreme Court of New Jersey lays out the difference between evidence presented at a motion to suppress [...]

[...] guide consideration of the quantum of a jury award were recently thoroughly examined by our Supreme Court. Although these principles are easily restated, their application – as the Court observed in [...]

[...] Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. Sometimes It Just Makes Sense to Talk to the Police State v. Merrit was [...]

[...] State vs. J.M. – submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark In this case the Appellate Division ruled that Rule 404(b), evidence of [...]

[...] Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark Vehicle Search After Accident to Identify Unconscious Driver State v. [...]

[...] Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Je ffrey Hark.  Originally published here. BRIDGETON — Timothy Seidel, the Laurel Lake [...]

Submitted by worker’s compensation attorney, Jeffrey Hark NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NE [...]

Submitted by Workers Compensation Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark HAROLD NAULTY v. TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON PUBLIC WORKS, We discern the following facts and pr [...]

Submitted by New Jersey Workers Compensation Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark HAROLD NAULTY v. TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON PUBLIC WORKS, This is an appeal of a wor [...]

Submitted by worker’s compensation attorney, Jeffrey Hark NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NE [...]

Submitted by Workers Compensation Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark HAROLD NAULTY v. TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON PUBLIC WORKS, We discern the following facts and pr [...]

Submitted by New Jersey Workers Compensation Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark HAROLD NAULTY v. TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON PUBLIC WORKS, This is an appeal of a wor [...]