Nick Malis Professional

[...] states challenging the constitutionality of portions of the ACA correctly argue that the Federal Government possess limited powers, and the powers not specifically granted to the Federal Government [...]

[...] Court’s docket, 28 states filed, or joined lawsuits challenging the ACA’s individual mandate arguing that Congress does not have the affirmative power to compel an individual to [...]

[...] the Government’s taxing authority, the IRS. Individual Mandate; Not a Creature of the Commerce Clause The Commerce Clause is used to greatly expand the scope of activities the Government can [...]

[...] health insurance policies providing minimum levels of coverage constitutional? 2. Is the Medicaid expansion which gives funds to the States on the condition that they provide specified health care to [...]

[...] to individuals with income below 133% of the federal poverty level or lose all of their federal Medicaid funding was unduly coercive. The Court’s decision rests on three issues. First, the [...]

[...] lower than the 133 percent above the federal poverty level. Although the ACA increases federal funding to assist in covering the increased coverage, States will still bear some of the increase in [...]

[...] unfairly since they were not given adequate notice that the expansion would be part of the Medicaid program when the State agreed to participate in it. Spending Clause programs are similar to [...]